Impeachments
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Go down
avatar
Posts : 94
Reputation : 185
Join date : 2019-11-19
View user profile

2018 Post NCT Thoughts Empty 2018 Post NCT Thoughts

Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:39 pm
St. Paul Division:

Yale B*
UC Irvine A*
Rhodes A
Cornell B**
Michigan
Howard**
NYU
Georgia Tech
Northwestern A
Indiana*
------
Haverford**
Harvard
Furman*
Emory*
Rutgers*

*in from “Bubble”
**Unpredicted in

Out from “Possible Champs”

Out from “Expect to Place”
UC Berkeley

Thoughts:
We want to focus on the surprising successes and surprising shortcomings, so we will start out with the two clear frontroners through R2, R3, & R4: UCI A and Yale B. Both teams were somewhat unexpected teams to be this highly ranked. But looking closer, UCI’s tied ballot with NYU A at UCLASSIC was an early indicator. After going 8-3 last year, Yale B on the other hand has had a rocky season this year. They failed to make it out of regionals and combined with their C team to barely scrape through ORCS. UCI was coming in from a 3-year slump, in which they pulled 4-4 records for three consecutive ORCS tournaments. This year, though, they managed to forge together a seasoned and talented lineup that include West Coast favorites such as Tristan Lim & Dev Madeka. These two teams with very different styles faced off in an epic R4 that as we all now know resulted in a ballot and a half for both teams and a 5th round for Yale B.

As we also heard during Closing Ceremony the fourth round resulted in a new record for tie breakers in making the final. Never before has a team been 1 ballot from their opponent's opponent away from the Final Round. This year we found out that OCS actually does end up mattering. It's anyone's guess how different the Final Round would've been with Miami facing a much more flashy and theatrical UCI.

While they weren’t talked about a lot, another team from this division that really surprised a lot of people was Cornell B. Cornell took a ballot off Yale B, something not many other teams did. They also managed to sweep Emory and took 2 against Furman. Again, this was Cornell’s B team, a team that many people were surprised to see making it out of ORCS. Cornell has become a Nationals regular who never tends to place until this year where they placed not one but two teams (and were another east coast program whose B team actually managed to out place their A team)!

Howard used to be one of the strongest programs in AMTA, and they proved this year that they still are. After barely making it out of Regionals and ORCS, they showed up at Nationals. Routine powers are known for having close matches against other powers but taking care of business when they play a weaker team. Howard did just that, taking 5.5 ballots from William and Mary and UC Santa Barbara. Their other two rounds were against NYU and Indiana, both of which were in the top 10.

There were also a couple teams who fell a little shorter than where we expected. Going into this tournament, NYU was by far the crowd favorite to win this division. With some of the most experienced attorneys and dynamic witnesses, this team has been incredibly hard to beat all year. They blew everyone out of the water at the Downtown and had several other strong invitationals performances. They qualified two teams out of ORCS despite an incredibly stacked Lancaster pool. But the bold arguments and aggressive demeanor they are known for didn’t work as well in Minneapolis as it has in New York, and NYU fell short of the final round with a crushing loss to Rhodes (whom they had already beaten in New York), and dropped ballots to Princeton and Howard. That being said, NYU still finished with 7 wins after an impressive sweep over UC Berkeley, another favored power.

As just mentioned, UC Berkeley was also heavily favored going into nationals with a reputation of being one of the best teams from the West Coast. They too faired poorly and were outperformed by UCLA, Stanford, UCI A, UCI B, and UCSD, almost every team that was repping the West. They were crushed by NYU (even with NYU’s judging pool problems), and only took 1 ballot off an unimpressive 4-8 Minneota. The one bright spot for their weekend seems to have been their decisive victory over Princeton, but this was not the top level performance one might expect from a team with UC Berkeley’s reputation. The West Coast crown will be in Newport Beach for the year.







Minneapolis Division:

Miami
UVA
Stanford
Rhodes B*
Arizona*
Tufts*
Lafayette**
Ohio State
Cornell A*
Chicago*
------
UCLA
Patrick Henry*
Rochester**

*in from “Bubble”
**Unpredicted in

Out from “Possible Champs”
Yale A

Out from “Expect to Place”
Florida A

Thoughts:

As they said during the awards ceremony, Miami won this division and it wasn’t even close. They came out of this tournament with an 11-1 record against a strong schedule. There were two full ballots separating them from the next best team (a far cry from what happened in the other division) in a division that was otherwise highly compressed. And they didn’t have an easy schedule to push them forward. They beat both Ohio State and Chicago in the middle rounds on P, and they managed to pull 20+ point victories over Lafayette in the fourth round (a team that had already taken out the 9th place team, Cornell). In fact their only weak point seems to have been in the first round playing Defense in the trial where they couldn’t call the defendant (which must have been something of a blow to their defense theory, which relied heavily on the defendant’s invention that the woman in Exhibit 10 was employed by the security company).

We also want to note the shocking development that was Lafayette College. For everyone who was at the opening ceremonies or watched it online, yes, we did not predict them to make it out of regionals, and yes, they were 7-2 going into the final round with Miami. They absolutely stunned us, and they deserve recognition for their exceptional nationals performance, they are absolutely a force to be reckoned with. Lafayette, unlike most north east teams, isn’t particularly aggressive, and instead plays a very straight up, polished type of mock trial which the judges really responded to. Lafayette had just gone 0-8 last year at ORCS and nobody thought that they would manage to turn things around to become a top contender the way that they were this year.

We also wanted to shoutout both Arizona and Ohio State who only made nationals with their B teams. Both programs restacked and threw together a team that had many of the A members who failed to make it out of ORCS, and those teams both proved their tough ORCS schedules wrong by both placing solidly in the top 10. Arizona, in particular, with an impressive 8 wins.

This was also, as mentioned above, a very compressed division. The difference between the third place team and the first honorable mention team was just one ballot. This was a division with a lot of splits and ties and a low number of clean vistories (15/48 rounds resulted in a 3-0). This may be attributable to the fact that the case this year was much simpler than the ones we have seen in previous years, and was, therefore, much harder to differentiate between the good and the truly great. Decisions with a case like this often come down to stylistic preference and that’s going to create a lot of splits and differences of opinion.

As with the other division, there were some unexpected failures, particularly from the Northeast and the West Coast. Notably, as Yale’s B team soared in the other division, Yale A, who many (including us) had selected as the potential division champions, failed dramatically at this tournament. This was a team with six returning All-Americans on its roster. It was the team that had just made the Downtown final. It qualified without difficulty from ORCS. And, yet, Yale A ended up 2-8-2 as the second worst team in the division, the worst showing any team from Yale A,B, or C has had at an AMTA tournament in some time now (and the worst showing Yale A has had at any tournament in years). They took no more than one ballot per round and in their last two rounds they only took half a ballot. In other words, the style that has worked for Yale in the past just wasn’t this Minneapolis judging pool’s cup of tea.

Similarly, the other team that could be said to have placed second at the Downtown (originally earning second and then ceding their place in the final to Yale for schedule reasons), UCLA underperformed (though not nearly as dramatically). They dropped from last year’s third place finish to an honorable mention placement at this year’s tournament. Their first honorable mention in some time. Many of their losses seemed to be in odd splits as well. In the second round, they beat Wheaton by convincing margins on two ballots and then dropped the third by just 3 points. Even more frustrating, they took two ballots from Irvine B by +21 and +14 and then dropped the third by -1. This screams again of stylistic issues with a judging pool that did not like their highly performative West Coast style.


Season In Review
This year felt surprising at times. We saw traditional powers like Columbia, Brown, Duke all fail to make an appearance to this year’s NCT, and we saw a lot of shake ups at ORCs resulting in B teams qualifying instead of their A teams. We saw the reemergence of UCI in the West and Lafayette become a new player on the Nationals field in the East. But as far as Nationals go, it seemed very reminiscent of what happened last time Nationals was held in Minneapolis. While the players weren’t all the same, the results for the most part were. If this year teaches us anything it is that you have to be willing to adapt to the judging pool.

Going forward into next year it will be interesting to see whether these new powers stay on the rise and whether some of the older powers continue to fall or whether we see a return to the normal status quo. In many ways it’s too early to predict, but we will make some early guesses. With Yale’s B team having made the final round this year, we can expect their A team next year to be versatile and unstoppable (they will have 14 All-Americans to choose from in building their roster). Miami, however, is more unclear. With most of their team from the national final graduating they will have a brand new A team built out of members who are as of now on their B team (which has not fared as well in recent years). On the other hand, they have a strong foundation of coaches to mass produce talent and they certainly have a history of being able to replace losses and come back strong.

It will also interesting to see the effect of moving the NCT site next year. Next year’s NCT will be in Philadelphia, so we can expect the judging pool to be entirely different from the one we saw this year in Minneapolis. As such, the winning strategy may have to be entirely different. It’s not entirely clear at this point how contemporary powers will fair in a region where traditional programs have maintained power. Many of the East Coast teams that struggled so much this year will be back on their home turf.


MAIMD Review
As many of you know, we wrote up a full pre-Nationals Power Ranking in which we ranked each of the 48 teams. We compared the final results both to our own Rankings and to AMTA’s TPR. The comparison showed that we were, on average, roughly 10.4 spots off, and TPR was 10.6 spots off. While 10 seems like a pretty wide margin to miss by, we wanted to note some of the major ‘misses’: Yale -43, Berkeley -26, Florida -24, Howard +20, Cornell B +33, Irvine A +23, and Lafayette +35. When compared to TPR our best changes were: 18 closer on Haverford, and 9 closer on UCI A. Our worst changes were: 10 worse on Princeton, and 9 worse on Howard.

The reality is that Mock Trial is tough to predict, we do our best, but even we can’t always be right (although we are extremely impressed and proud of ourselves for doing a whopping .2 places better AMTA!). We always encourage others to voice their disagreements on our analysis, and while we try to remain as objective as possible, sometimes, as seen, we are wrong! If anyone thinks that there is some metric or something that we should focus more on in our analysis, we would love to hear it and try to incorporate it in the future! We are glad so many people enjoyed reading our analysis, and we intend to continue with a Region focussed review of Nationals as well as a pre Trial by Combat write up soon!
Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum